Dermatology residency 2+2 research tracks: A cross sectional survey
Need to claim your poster? Find the KiKo table at the conference and they'll help
you get set up.
Presented at: Society for Investigative Dermatology 2025
Date: 2025-05-07 00:00:00
Views: 2
Summary: Abstract Body: The 2+2 research track dermatology residency model combines two years of clinical training with two years of dedicated research time. These programs are designed to balance comprehensive clinical training with preparing residents for a career in academic research. The objective of this survey study is to analyze the number of current 2+2 programs in the United States and identify factors that influence the success of these programs. A national survey was sent to 141 program directors to assess the number of 2+2 programs and the residents enrolled, key selection criteria for research-track applicants, dedicated clinical and research time distribution and funding mechanisms. Outcomes include career progression, and retention rates. Concurrently, 4 reviewers evaluated residency program websites for advertisement of 2+2 positions. Of the 24 responses, 33% (n=8) reported offering 2+2 research track positions, with an average of 1-2 positions available annually. From a review of residency program websites, only 14 programs advertise 2+2 research track positions. Regarding selection criteria, the majority of the programs (n=7) prioritized research interest followed by interview performance and publication record. 75% of positions are supported by department/division funds. Furthermore, 75-100% of graduates pursued independently funded research post-residency, with retention rates ranging from 25-100% in the 2+2 programs. URM representation showed significant variability across programs, with less than 30% of trainees identifying as underrepresented in medicine. The 2+2 dermatology residency programs are key for training future physician-scientists in dermatology. However, challenges remain in representation and funding. Addressing these gaps may help improve equity in clinical research and strengthen the dermatology research workforce. John Meisenheimer<sup>1</sup>, Tasneem Issa<sup>2</sup>, Dana Simon<sup>3</sup>, Maria Teachout<sup>1</sup>, Patrick McClain<sup>4</sup>, Hani Abi<sup>2</sup>, Robert Dellavalle<sup>1</sup> 1. Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 2. University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 3. Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI, United States. 4. Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, United States. Clinical Research: Epidemiology and Observational Research